This offered a crucial inconsistency during the timeline of functions. If The seller had in fact offered the match residence on the defendants, it absolutely was envisioned that he would've pointed out this sale in his statement recorded on 20-09-1999. Even so, no such assertion was manufactured. The petitioner argued https://hire-damages-lawyer-near27618.blogdon.net/top-latest-five-damages-lawyer-in-karachi-urban-news-45659863